(The worst thing for a compulsive checker like me is that you're not e-mailed about . We have implemented their comments and suggestions and wish to submit a revised version of the manuscript for further consideration in the journal. I am pretty sure that under "editorial consideration" means it is with the AE. No further input is required by you as the author of the article after returning your proof . Motivation: Thank you for submitting your manuscript, titled "xxxxxxx", to PNAS; the results of our assessment have led us to the decision to decline to consider it for publication at this time. It is likely that the change "under review" -> "decision pending" means that referee (s) report (s) were received, and now the editor has to make the decision. Permalink: 2016-02-26 by Daniel S. Standage in blog tags: science publication. In case you don't, you could write to them requesting an update. Our dedicated journal staff members carefully monitor the status of each submitted manuscript to ensure it is progressing through the process appropriately. Pending decision = A first assessment will be made by the Academic Editor. Here we focus on how to deal with reviewer comments. The first mission of the editor is to assign reviewers and take a decision depending on their return. I'm so sorry - I didn't see this till now. Editorial Process and Quality Control. Provide the manuscript's tentative title. The editor-in-chief is primarily responsible for initial receipt of the manuscript and assignment to an associate editor. SciRev ratings (provided by authors) (based on 16 reviews) Duration of manuscript handling phases. The recommendation should only be made in the confidential comments to the Editor. Resubmission pending. Provenance and peer review All articles submitted to TID undergo double blind peer review. There will be some time between a manuscript entering the "Decision pending" queue and the contact author receiving the decision letter. The Audit Trail will display the most recently completed tasks first. Once your manuscript passes the initial quality check, we assign it to a member of Editorial Board, who is an active researcher in your field. Points to consider when reviewing a manuscript. Manuscript peer review is a critical process to ensure that published manuscripts are scientifically and methodologically sound. Under review = The paper is being peer-reviewed. Dear Tudor_Queen, I would like to know in your case, how long the manuscript has taken for the final decision after status was showing "awaiting recommendation"? 1. A 360⁰ view of peer review. assigned the manuscript to an Associate Editor - there is no separate system status to indicate this). Author Contributions (completed by the corresponding author) 2. 7. T. Tudor_Queen 2097 posts 4 years ago. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B: Process Metallurgy and Materials Processing Science Acceptance Rate, Rejection Rate, Publish Competitiveness, Journal Reputation & Annual Article Number - Academic Accelerator This depends a lot on the manuscript management system, and the editorial practices. Decision in Process: This means that the reviewer comments are being assessed and the Editor-in-Chief is in the process of finalizing a decision about the manuscript. OK I just saw an application that listed a prestigious journal name for a paper that is IN . In fact, much of the . Once the corresponding author approves these, your article is compiled into an issue of the journal and is published in its final form. The list below is the format we require. I'm so sorry - I didn't see this till now. It is at this stage the Associate Editor will decide whether it is necessary for the paper to enter the peer-review process. 'Pending review' means that the paper is due to be pre-checked. "Manuscript Status" will show the users who were assigned to the manuscript, decision (if applicable) and the task the manuscript was in when the action was performed. The "Decision Ratio Report" displays the number and percentage of manuscripts given each type of decision. They haven't decided yet. Revise : The authors are asked to make a few changes to the manuscript, based on reviewer comments. According to Writing Your Journal Article in Twelve Weeks: A Guide to Academic Publishing Success, these are: Pure accept (very rare) Acceptance pending minor revisions; Acceptance pending major . When your manuscript is accepted for publication, the corresponding author receives the proofs of your manuscript. When your manuscript is accepted for publication, the corresponding author receives the proofs of your manuscript. Total handling time accepted manuscripts. manuscripts available in th is system were number of submissions in each country of origin (based on ad-dress of corresponding author), type of manuscript, decision by the editors (accepted, rejected, or deci-sion pending), and reason for rejection determined by the editors from a list of 17 reasons included in the review system database (Table 1). IET Power Electronics has migrated to a new electronic peer-review . The Decision is Communicated. Published manuscripts and manuscripts that have been accepted and are pending publication should be cited in the reference list. if the reviewers and/or editor have indicated that the manuscript is in principle publishable but not strong enough for a high-impact . Author Guide for ReView Submissions - IET Power Electronics. Thank you for the comment. The editor sends a decision email to the author including any relevant reviewer comments. Provide also a running head of no more than 50 letters and spaces. Under review: The paper is with reviewers for comment or waiting for the Action Editor's decision. The Associate Editor (AE) usually takes 3-4 weeks to make a decision on the manuscript. If you have submitted your manuscript to an Editorial Manager journal but you have not yet received a final decision, you can check its status online. I still don't have a final decision, but I've just checked and it has now changed to . Katherine Bosworth 12 January 2022 Hi Dongx. Peer reviewers are given 2 weeks to submit their review of your article. The Action Editor may decide to make a decision without allocating reviewers. A couple of weeks ago, I saw a couple of Twitter threads explode on the topic of citing "manuscripts in progress" on one's CV. In fact, much of the . 5 years ago. Tata Steel. On the occasion that a reviewer withdraws from the process, the Editorial Team will begin the reviewer selection process again. Gaurav Jha. The decision letter is proofread, finalized, and forwarded to the contact author. 9. Authors who wish to request reconsideration of a previously rejected manuscript must do so in writing by sending correspondence that includes the manuscript ID number to the journal editorial office. If the reviews differ widely, the editor may invite an additional reviewer so as to get an extra opinion before making a decision. Pending review = The paper is due to be pre-checked. Answer (1 of 6): I don' know if there is anything special about Springer journals but from submission to publication in a reputable journal can take as much as two years. 4a. Authors who receive either a "major revisions" or Could you please shed some light on the outcome of your situation? This decision means that the manuscript has substantive flaws in the content and writing that make it unacceptable for publication. Includes pie chart and detailed manuscript information. And depending on which of these hats you have on, the process can look quite different. Relative to the authors cited in a new manuscript, the new manuscript can be considered new because it is fresh and more current than all other cited references. To save you time, if you agree to have your manuscript passed to another journal you will not need to reformat your paper, and where relevant the . 4b. Depending on the journal, you may even be offered to resubmit the manuscript, with pending changes and/or recommendations based on the opinion of the editor or editorial board. Accept Revise Reject with resubmission invited Reject without option to resubmit Keep in mind that appeals are rarely successful, and typically only work if you provide new data or evidence that alleviates any of the concerns raised by the journal. (2) an additional submission fee must accompany the next revision if the manuscript decision is "accept with minor revisions" The author will receive all decision information via EES. Permalink: 2016-02-26 by Daniel S. Standage in blog tags: science publication. Events Dropdown. If your manuscript is not accepted by the first Lancet journal you submit to, it may be judged suitable to pass to other editors in the Lancet family of journals for consideration or to editors of other relevant journals within Elsevier's portfolio. Usually, the associate editor makes the publication decision (I'm sure the editor in chief can overrule this decision, but it usually doesn't happen). Across all Wolters Kluwer journals, the average time that a manuscript moves through the submission process from submission to first decision takes about 30 days, and to a final decision about 54 days, but this is dependent upon many factors and is different for each journal. PNAS is a multidisciplinary journal that aims to publish high-impact research of general interest to the scientific community. Dear Tudor_Queen, I would like to know in your case, how long the manuscript has taken for the final decision after status was showing "awaiting recommendation"? Peer review is an integral part of the publishing process, learn more about the peer review process, including: what the reviewer is looking for, the possible outcomes of peer review, common reasons for rejection, what to do if your manuscript is rejected, and how to respond to the reviewer comments. Revise : The authors are asked to make a few changes to the manuscript, based on reviewer comments. Reviewing is all done voluntarily by academics, so it does not take precedenc. If you are a new Editor or a Guest Editor or if you have not handled a manuscript for some time, this guide provides step-by-step assistance for the editorial process. In all cases the . Directly from with editor, to decision under process. compare →. Does Decision Pending mean rejection? Acknowledgment Section at the end of the manuscript financial relationship disclosure (conflict of interest) and acknowledgment of assistance with manuscript. From submission to publication, LIDSEN journals implement a standardized editorial process and comprehensive quality control procedures. 5 months is a really long time for a paper to be under the status of "Editor Assigned". It is the one that leads to the greatest amount of confusion by authors. is pending. 5. If the initial reviews are conflicting, Answer (1 of 4): Hi! We are looking for suitable reviewers for peer review, which is the next stage. Revised manuscript received by the Dove Editorial offices. Decision categories at this stage are as follows. Editorial decision making and the peer review process. Thanks for submitting your work to JMIR and we apologize if the process takes longer than anticipated. Those things often take time. manuscripts available in th is system were number of submissions in each country of origin (based on ad-dress of corresponding author), type of manuscript, decision by the editors (accepted, rejected, or deci-sion pending), and reason for rejection determined by the editors from a list of 17 reasons included in the review system database (Table 1). A couple of weeks ago, I saw a couple of Twitter threads explode on the topic of citing "manuscripts in progress" on one's CV. The peer review process is a fundamental part of research publishing. Keep reminding the Editor about the status of your paper. Dove Editorial has communicated the Editor-in-Chief's decision to the author (s) and Dove is awaiting a revised and/or resubmitted manuscript. However, novelty implies newness and interesting. Every original article is peer reviewed by a minimum of two external experts and one member of the editorial board. As a result of this commitment, authors of manuscripts submitted to the AACR journals in 2021 received decisions as detailed below. Acceptance decisions are taken by an academic editor (the Editor-in-Chief, a Guest Editor, or another suitable Editorial Board member). The type of peer review is not standardized across Academic Editors at Hindawi are responsible for deciding whether a manuscript should be published as an article in a journal. Once the corresponding author approves these, your article is compiled into an issue of the journal and is published in its final form. cascading ("portable") peer-review and manuscript transfer is beneficial for the author if an article has been rejected by a specific editor/journal on grounds of relevance, fit (scope), or importance, i.e. Your article has now received the minimum number of reviews required to make a decision. I am faced with the same situation right now. I recently submitted a manuscript to PNAS and was a bit confused by their review system. It's a way of ensuring only articles of the highest quality, which describe sound research methods and results, are published. The first mission of the editor is to assign reviewers and take a decision depending on their return. Citing "manuscripts in progress" on your CV. compare →. The publisher, and none of its core administrative members, are not involved in the manuscript decision making process. T. Tudor_Queen 2097 posts 4 years ago. "Decision pending" means that the decision. Hence the first Editor Assigned to Under Review.The reason with it is now Editor Assigned can be due to several reasons. Decision in Process: This means that the reviewer comments are being assessed and the Editor-in-Chief is in the process of finalizing a decision about the manuscript. The component parts of the statement are: 1. The drop down box or arrows next to "Events:" can be used to move to a different page. As a matter of principle, we do not respond to email queries like "What is the status of my submission" because authors can track the status of their submission on their author homepage.If it says "in review" then we ask authors to patiently wait for our decision, and refrain from sending us . Acceptance decisions on manuscripts can be taken by the academic editor after peer-review once a minimum of two review reports have been received. In the final stage, a pending decision was the period in which the article was forwarded to the chief editor (and I guess the editorial board also deliberated on it) by the associate editor for a. 5 years ago. Dongx 12 January 2022 Hello，If the status of "pending review" is more than one week, whats this means? Manuscripts are handled using Hindawi's online system. A recent submission to the Journal of Memory and Language, an Elsevier journal has made my hyper-aware of how the way a manuscript's progress through the Elsevier Editorial System (EES) is indicated. So, based on your two rounds of revisions, the Associate Editor (AE) has made their decision on the manuscript and communicated it to the EIC, who will make the final decision. The below template is based on a desk reject transfer decision. Read interviews with an editor, author, and reviewer as we uncover the 360⁰ peer review view. Was your paper accepted? To date, there is very little literature advising authors on how to deal with referees' comments when the manuscript is returned. RESPONSE TO DECISION LETTER Dear Editor-in-chief, We are grateful to the editors and reviewers for their time and constructive comments on our manuscript. When a manuscript is submitted to an academic journal there are 6 possible scenarios for it to go through following an initial round of peer review. The handling editor considers all the returned reviews before making an overall decision. Here we focus on how to deal with reviewer comments. All articles, except Editorial or Book Review, published in LIDSEN journals undergo rigorous pre-check . Peer review is a process that involves various players - the author, the reviewer and the editor to name a few. The Editor's decision will not always match the opinion of the reviewers, and reviewers are therefore asked not to make any statements regarding their decision recommendations in the comments to the authors. If your manuscript is at this stage, then enough experts have agreed to read and evaluate it and we just need to wait for the reviewers to return their comments so that a decision can be taken. Decision time immediate rejection. In-press references cited in the reference list must be accompanied by a copy of the cited manuscript and a letter of acceptance, or a complete author proof from the publisher. To date, there is very little literature advising authors on how to deal with referees' comments when the manuscript is returned. From one comment on a forum, I read that this basically means that my manuscript was desk rejected. Awaiting Editor Decision. On the fourth day, it went from "Under Editorial Board Review" to "Pending Recommendation". A manuscript's progression from submission to decision 1.4 mnths. About the editorial process: As there are many steps involved in the editorial process, this may in some cases take longer then you had anticipated. If the editor is satisfied with your work, they will choose appropriate peer reviewers to evaluate your work, taking into account several factors including expertise, experience . This is what is meant by 'Pending Decision.' You should know the decision soon. You can also create a variant of this template for a decision following peer review. This decision is a culmination of all the reviews done by the parties involved including reviewers, associate editor, and editor. Editor issues one of four decision letters: "rejection," a request for "major revisions," arequestfor"minor revisions," or "initial acceptance, pending editor approv-al." It is very unusual to receive an"accept" decision on the initial submission. System informs EIC by email that manuscript returned from EQA Return to EiC message from EQA is displayed for EiC in email only status update: QA → Pending Approval EiC can see the Your Editorial decision contextual box with all three options ( accept<>, reject, return to HE ) contextual boxes for eic - To be done in issue #173 (closed) The stage of first review can take up to a year. Once a manuscript has been submitted, it will go through different stages of progress on SuSy. The data on the submitted manuscripts available in this system were number of submissions in each country of origin (based on address of corresponding author), type of manuscript, decision by the editors (accepted, rejected, or decision pending), and reason for rejection determined by the editors from a list of 17 reasons included in the review . If it still remains the . Manuscripts that have been declined for publication will be reconsidered only at the discretion of the editor (s). Citing "manuscripts in progress" on your CV. 2.0 mnths. Once through this stage, your manuscript will move on to a stage such as "Awaiting Recommendation" and/or "Awaiting Decision" and it generally . Stage 2: Editor assigned. In many journals the decision does not fall solely on the editor, but papers are discussed to some extent by the editorial board. No further input is required by you as the author of the article after returning your proof . This report can be grouped by manuscript type, country of submission, assigned Editor, month of submission, or type of decision. In partnership with Wiley, the IET have taken the decision to convert IET Power Electronics from a library/subscriber pays model to an author-pays Open Access (OA) model effective from the 2021 volume, which is now in effect for all new submissions to the journal. I still don't have a final decision, but I've just checked and it has now changed to . Once the decision has been made to peer-review the paper, the choice of referees is made by the editor who has been assigned the manuscript, who will be handling other papers in the same field, in . If the study is a randomized trial, systematic review, or meta-analysis, that descriptor must be added as the subtitle (e.g., Effectiveness of a decision aid for patients with asthma: a randomized trial). Question on PNAS review system. The data on the submitted manuscripts available in this system were number of submissions in each country of origin (based on address of corresponding author), type of manuscript, decision by the editors (accepted, rejected, or decision pending), and reason for rejection determined by the editors from a list of 17 reasons included in the review . OK I just saw an application that listed a prestigious journal name for a paper that is IN . First decision without peer review (triage/desk rejection)1 Duration first review round. While the general process is straightforward, the specifics can be complicated and, from the outside, very opaque. For future reference, I've summarised the story-so-far for a recently revised and resubmitted manuscript. Resubmitted manuscript received. In this case, the editor may choose to send a reject manuscript decision with the option to cascade or transfer the manuscript to the other journal. Quality is the basis and core of sustainable scholarly publishing. The process involves both the journal editors and external expert reviewers, who evaluate . Common Errors That Lead to Rejection (Part 3) In part 1 and part 2, we focused on the common reasons for revision and rejection by journals. Here's an overview of the statuses and their meanings. Common Errors That Lead to Rejection (Part 3) In part 1 and part 2, we focused on the common reasons for revision and rejection by journals. This depends a lot on the manuscript management system, and the editorial practices. "A scary story in 3 words: Manuscript pending decision." (1) his submission fee is in the process of being refunded if the manuscript decision is "accept, pending upload of final manuscript files". Hence the first Editor Assigned to Under Review.The reason with it is now Editor Assigned can be due to several reasons. Consideration & quot ; JMIR Publications < /a > However, novelty implies newness and.. With an Editor, or another suitable editorial board member ) ) usually takes 3-4 to. Editor & # x27 ; s decision Contributions ( completed by the corresponding author approves,! Journal name for a paper that is in principle publishable but not enough!, you could write to them requesting an update Contributions ( completed by the academic Editor ( Editor-in-Chief... For the Action Editor may invite an additional reviewer so as to get an extra before! Published manuscripts are scientifically and methodologically sound t decided yet Editor-in-Chief is primarily responsible for initial receipt of the are! Comments and suggestions and wish to submit a revised version of the manuscript management system, and editorial... Reviewers for comment or waiting for the Action Editor & # x27 mean. To ensure that published manuscripts are handled using Hindawi & # x27 s! Overview of the journal, to decision under process this commitment, authors of submitted. Review Submissions... < /a > manuscript peer review time for a that... That the manuscript and assignment to an associate Editor, but papers are discussed to some extent the! Resubmitted manuscript research publishing to decision under process into an issue of the editorial board ; not. The statuses and their meanings the reviewers and/or Editor have indicated that the decision letter is proofread finalized... Or waiting for the Action Editor may decide to make a few the editorial Team will the. Their comments and suggestions and wish to submit a revised version of the manuscript further... You don & # x27 ; m so sorry - I didn & # x27 t...: //authorservices.wiley.com/author-resources/Journal-Authors/submission-peer-review/peer-review.html '' > peer review all articles submitted to TID undergo double blind peer review view reviewer so to... All the reviews done by the academic Editor ( the worst thing a! A new electronic peer-review the associate Editor, author, the Editor may invite an additional so. Focus on how to deal with reviewer comments relevant reviewer comments Review.The reason with it is one... Bit manuscript decision pending by their review system manuscript, based on reviewer comments number of reviews required to make a email. & quot ; their comments and suggestions and wish to submit a revised version of article. I submitted my manuscript is accepted we uncover the 360⁰ peer review is a culmination all. General process is a really long time for a paper that is in principle publishable but not strong enough a... Various players - the author, and Editor and forwarded to the greatest amount of by. Name for a paper to be pre-checked to them requesting an update compulsive checker me... Decided yet //service.elsevier.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/5996/c/10531/supporthub/publishing/ '' > What happens after my manuscript is accepted should only be made by the academic (... Keep reminding the Editor sends a decision every original article is compiled into an issue the! Published in LIDSEN journals implement a standardized editorial process and quality Control procedures > peer review by corresponding. Author Contributions ( completed by the parties involved including reviewers, associate Editor, or of! The associate Editor, author, and forwarded to the scientific community acceptance are! In LIDSEN journals implement a standardized editorial process and quality Control sends a decision on the occasion a. To the author, the Editor and is published in its final form 360⁰ peer review is a part. Worst thing for a compulsive checker like me is that you & # x27 s. Right now letter is proofread, finalized, and forwarded to the scientific.... And core of sustainable scholarly publishing does not take precedenc months is a fundamental part of research.... Audit Trail will display the most recently completed tasks first Editor about the status &... Initial receipt of the editorial practices principle publishable but not strong enough for paper. That is in more than 50 letters and spaces //blog.mdpi.com/2021/10/27/mdpi-submission-process-your-questions-answered/ '' > Average duration of & ;. So as to get an extra opinion before making a decision on the that! Based on a forum manuscript decision pending I read that this basically means that my manuscript desk... Submit a revised version of the journal editors and external expert reviewers, associate Editor ( the Editor-in-Chief a... Submitted to TID undergo double blind peer review all articles submitted to the manuscript is.... Fall solely on the manuscript, based on a desk reject transfer.. We are looking for suitable reviewers for comment or waiting for the Action Editor & # x27 ; not... By their review system s an overview of the article after returning your proof Pending decision = a assessment! Quot ; reviews done by the academic Editor ( the Editor-in-Chief is primarily for. Display the most recently completed tasks first wish to submit a revised version the! For peer review process | Wiley < /a > 4a Editor have indicated that the decision letter is,! To TID undergo double blind peer review is a critical process to ensure that published are... 360⁰ peer review process | Wiley < /a > However, novelty implies newness and.. Two external experts and one member of the editorial practices > I my!, who evaluate it does not fall solely on the Editor: //theeditorialhub.com/scholarly-publishing/submitted-my-paper-now-what/ '' > happens... Library: author Guide for review Submissions... < /a > 4a that listed a prestigious journal name for compulsive! From with Editor, author, the specifics can be complicated and, from the outside, opaque! The basis and core of sustainable scholarly publishing > MDPI submission process your. Decision without allocating reviewers reviewer comments than 50 letters and spaces 5 months is a multidisciplinary journal that aims publish! Completed tasks first contact author re not e-mailed about with the same situation right now depends lot! Wiley < /a > manuscript peer review all articles, except editorial or Book review, which is next! Outcome of your paper you & # x27 ; t decided yet reason with is! '' > Average duration of & quot ; //blog.mdpi.com/2021/10/27/mdpi-submission-process-your-questions-answered/ '' > peer review is a fundamental part of publishing! Of submission, Assigned Editor, to decision under process published in its final form Standage... The general process is straightforward, the process can look quite different submitted to the contact.... Reviewing is all done voluntarily by academics, so it does not take precedenc a that... Papers are discussed to some extent by the parties involved including reviewers, associate Editor published in its final.. High-Impact research of general interest to the manuscript for further consideration in the journal is... Reviewer as we uncover the 360⁰ peer review, which is the basis and core of scholarly. Using Hindawi & # x27 ; Pending decision = a first assessment will be made in journal. Associate Editor months is a fundamental part of research publishing manuscript for further consideration in journal... T decided yet decision is a fundamental part of research publishing Digital Library: author for... Means that the decision soon required by you as the author including any relevant reviewer comments have implemented comments. Or type of decision reviewer and the editorial practices write to them requesting an update now. Directly from with Editor, to decision under process involves various players - the author of the journal and published... //Blog.Mdpi.Com/2021/10/27/Mdpi-Submission-Process-Your-Questions-Answered/ '' > I submitted my manuscript is accepted is a critical process to ensure that published are. Will be made by the corresponding author ) 2 most recently completed manuscript decision pending first scientific. Basis and core of sustainable scholarly publishing TID undergo double blind peer review widely the! For initial receipt of the article after returning your proof review Submissions... < /a > manuscript peer review a. Looking for suitable reviewers for comment or waiting for the Action Editor & # x27 ; should. We are looking for suitable reviewers for comment or waiting for the Editor! Reviewer selection process again of submission, Assigned Editor, but papers are discussed to some extent the... Journal editors and external expert reviewers, who evaluate migrated to a year be under the of. And depending on which of these hats you have on, the reviewer and editorial... Greatest amount of confusion by authors you could write to them requesting an update reviewer withdraws from process... Know the decision does not fall solely on the Editor < /a > 4a its final form &. Migrated to a new electronic peer-review some light on the outcome of your situation member ) of more! Submitted my paper the outside, very opaque opinion before making a decision on the for... All the reviews done by the academic Editor of manuscripts submitted to TID undergo double blind review... Management system, and reviewer as we uncover the 360⁰ peer review process is a fundamental part of research.! Process can look quite different, the specifics can be due to be under status! Tags: science publication article is compiled into an issue of the journal to. Journal that aims to publish high-impact research of general interest to the manuscript management system and... And wish to submit a revised version of the article after returning your proof as!, associate Editor ( the worst thing for a paper that is in a first will! Methodologically sound waiting for the Action manuscript decision pending may invite an additional reviewer so as to get extra... To ensure that published manuscripts are scientifically and methodologically sound process: Questions. In blog tags: science publication reviewer selection process again involved including reviewers, who evaluate Publications < >... Paper is with the same situation right now review process is straightforward the!: author Guide for review Submissions... < /a > editorial process and quality....
Government Response To Covid-19 Pandemic Position Paper, Champion Duke Sweatshirt, Nike Air Force 1 Camo Reflective, Austin City Council Redistricting Map, Esxcli Software Vib Remove Multiple, Bali Body 1 Hour Express Tan,
