In evaluating an application, the examining attorney conducts a search of USPTO records to determine whether there is . (3) the similarity of the products or services. The most common are: Likelihood of Confusion: The USPTO conducts a search for conflicting marks as part of the official examination of an application only after a trademark application is filed. 1. When evaluating the likelihood of consumer confusion, courts often consider what are commonly referred to as the Sleekcraft factors: i) strength of the plaintiff's mark, ii) proximity of the . On the other hand, mere conceptual similarity is unlikely to lead to 'likelihood of confusion', unless the earlier mark has a strong distinctive character. Under Section 2(d) of the Trademark Act, the USPTO is legally obligated to refuse registration of your trademark if it's likely to cause confusion with a mark in an existing . Contact Us. . This will pull up the Cited Registration's database entry with the United States Patent & Trademark Office. For example, in the Second Circuit, a court considers the Polaroid Factors: " (1) the strength of the plaintiff's mark; (2) the degree of similarity between . In our example, the LAS VEGAS GOLDEN KNIGHTS trademark application was refused based on a likelihood of confusion with GOLDEN KNIGHTS College of Saint Rose logo registration, seen at the end of the animation above. The other kind is the kind of famous that arises in the context of the LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION inquiry — what most circuits call "strong . STRENGTH OF THE SENIOR MARK. Proving trademark infringement can be difficult. Likelihood of Confusion Factors. The level of sophistication of purchasers and the care in exercising a purchasing decision are factors to be considered [see TMEP § 1207.01 (d) (vii) ]. So basically marks do not need to be exact conflicts to be considered for refusal. The tendency of applicants who receive a likelihood of confusion rejection is to reason why they (the business owner . There are two main formats that are widely accepted, the Eveready format and the Squirt format, each with key differences. For example, whether a new comer using the mark Coke Cola would cause confusion in the . The is often called the likelihood of confusion test. In the ex parte examination of a trademark application, a refusal under §2 (d) is normally based on the examining attorney's conclusion that the applicant's mark, as used on or in connection with the specified goods or services, so resembles a registered mark as to be likely to cause confusion. Likelihood of confusion is determined by looking at several factors regarding the similarity of the marks, the similarity of the goods and services associated with the marks, their respective channels of trade, evidence of actual confusion, and several other considerations collectively known as the "DuPont factors" as put forth in In re E . The statutory basis for a likelihood confusion cause of action may be found in Section 2 (d) of the Trademark Act. Four of those marks, each with a different design element, are shown below: 4 2015) (finding trademark infringement where franchisee continued to use franchisor's 5 mark without consent following termination of franchise agreements and noting 6 likelihood of confusion that would arise from holdover franchisee's use of mark); Gen. 7 Motors LLC v. W. Covina . Existing Trademark Priority Rights. To learn the fundamentals on this topic, see our web page entitled, Overcoming a Likelihood Of Confusion Refusal. Stratus appealed to the CAFC. For example, since an amendment to Section 32 of the Lanham Act in 1962 to eliminate that provision's focus on the point of sale, courts have increasingly recognized that any kind of confusion is actionable. The more similarity between the two marks, the more likely the confusion. Likelihood of Confusion (or Confusing Similarity) is the legal standard that determines whether or not trademark infringement has occurred. Below is a recent Office Action Response filing made with the USPTO arguing against a likelihood of confusion. These examples would likely fail the "meaning" test. 4. A Trademark is a branding device (typically a name, logo, or phrase) which when used in conjunction with the sale of a good or service, identifies the source-company which sells the good or service. . 1207.01 Likelihood of Confusion. - ck Name (Required) Email (Required) Phone (Required) Message. Again, this likelihood of confusion constitutes a conflict. Trademark law protects a trademark owner's exclusive right to use a trademark when use of the mark by another would be likely to cause consumer confusion as to the source or origin of goods. § 1052(e)(1). a table of confusion (sometimes also called a confusion matrix) is a table with . Moreover, a word trademark registration is entitled to all depictions of the standard character mark regardless of font style, size or color . Contact Us. While failing any one of sight/sound/meaning test does not lead to an automatic Likelihood of Confusion finding…it could. If you have questions about trademark confusion or infringement, please contact the firm for a courtesy consultation. Whether it is likely that the marketplace would confuse the origin of a product or service as being that of a second comer. Surveys in Trademark Litigation: Likelihood of Confusion and Dilution LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION FACTORS 1) The strength of plaintiff's mark 2) The similarity of the two marks 3) The competitive proximity of the products 4) The likelihood that plaintiff will bridge the gap and offer a product like defendant's Below are ten critical rules for trademark applicants to keep in mind when confronted with a . (TTAB 1984) ("the Trademark Act does not preclude registration of a mark where there is a possibility of confusion as to source or origin, only where such confusion is likely") (emphasis added). Reasonable likelihood of confusion is very difficult to determine. When the USPTO review's a trademark application, the most common substantive refusal is due to the finding of a "likelihood of confusion." . § 1052(d), as well as a descriptiveness refusal pursuant to Trademark Act Section 2(e)(1), 15 U.S.C. Evidence of actual confusion between two trademarks can be difficult to prove, so the plaintiff in a trademark infringement case will only need to show . If you cause someone else's trademark to be diluted, you can be held liable. The United States Patent and Trademark Office . In October 2018, the Board found a likelihood of confusion between the marks and refused registration of the STRATUS mark. This is why it is useful to have proposed names vetted by a trademark lawyer before investing significant time and energy into your company name and/or mark. Likelihood of Confusion Factors The two most important factors in determining a likelihood of confusion Page 10/30. Protecting your intellectual property is . Example #2: FOREVER ART. A trademark opposition may be commenced based on a likelihood of confusion with a prior registered mark. Point out each and every difference in appearance, sound, connotation (the . See our firm page entitled, Likelihood of Confusion Refusals, 2(d) Refusals, to review the 13 factors considered in this analysis. The Board considered the " DuPont factors . Trademark likelihood of confusion is the touchstone issue for questions of infringement under U.S. This is why it is useful to have proposed names vetted by a trademark lawyer before investing significant time and energy into your company name and/or mark. Surveys in Trademark Litigation: Likelihood of Confusion and Dilution LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION FACTORS 1) The strength of plaintiff's mark 2) The similarity of the two marks 3) The competitive proximity of the products 4) The likelihood that plaintiff will bridge the gap and offer a product like defendant's A common mistake is that applicants submit the wrong type of arguments in reply to a 2(d) Likelihood of Confusion Refusal. Although likelihood of confusion and dilution are the two main trademark-related causes of action, there exist a number of additional state-law causes of action . confusion survey. A confusingly similar mark infringes upon those rights. The Trademark Office therefore tries to prevent the registration of confusingly similar marks. When the examiner believes that a conflict exists between the applicant's mark and a registered mark, he or she will refuse registration of the applicant's mark on the ground of likelihood of confusion. A court will measure distinctiveness along the following spectrum: A). Similar trademarks examples consist of two businesses in the same industry using trademarks that are alike enough to cause market confusion.7 min read. The analysis involves comparing the plaintiff's trademark to the infringing trademark and looking for similarities. §1052 (a) bars registration of marks that are immoral, deceptive, scandalous or if the mark falsely suggests a connection with persons (living or dead), institutions, national symbols, or beliefs. . Reebok or Adidas). Example. Trademark Examining Attorney's requirements, Applicant disclaimed "PHOTOGRAPHY" apart from the mark as shown and submitted the following 1 Application Serial No. Trademark law exists to secure rights to a mark and prevent this type of confusion. (footnote 1) As you are undoubtedly aware, your domain names are exactly the same as [TRADEMARK OWNER]'s Marks. . Name (Required) Email (Required) Phone (Required) For example, counsel argued, the TTAB does not consider in its likelihood-of-confusion analysis how the parties actually use their marks, but rather compares the marks only as they appear on the respective registrations or applications. Likelihood of confusion exists between trademarks when the marks are so similar and the goods . Of course, there are certain elements and comparisons which prevail over others. The USPTO can refuse registration for a number of reasons. - ck Trademark Law. Section 6 of The Trade-marks Act sets out the test for confusion in Canadian trademark law.. The 13 Dupont Factors are: The similarity or dissimilarity of each trademark in question. The USPTO offers some guidance in preventing confusion. Mr. Tong has been obtaining trademark registrations for his clients since 2001. 2. Section 2 (a) of the Trademark Act, 15 U.S.C. 1. Trademark attorney Draeke Weseman is co-presenting a Strafford webinar, "Registering Trademarks: Overcoming Section 2(d) Likelihood of Confusion Refusals," on Thursday, December 6, 2018.This CLE webinar will guide trademark counsel in understanding how examining attorneys at the United States Patent and Trademark Office and panels at the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board decide the issue of . Breaking Down the Factors. Likelihood of Confusion. This includes appearance, connotation, commercial impression and auditory resemblance. 1. Learn how to successfully overcome USPTO office actions citing 2(d) likelihood of confusion and to register your trademark application. The similarity or dissimilarity of the nature of the goods or services. Sometimes they're the only way to actually prove likelihood of confusion. For example, the trademark "Nike," along with the Nike "swoosh," identify the shoes made by Nike and distinguish them from shoes made by other companies (e.g. . If you have questions concerning a possible disclaimer statement required by the Trademark Office, or other questions relating to trademarks, please feel free to contact the firm for a courtesy consultation. The USPTO may be required to refuse registration of your mark on numerous grounds. 1207.01 Likelihood of Confusion. The following are examples of related . The Federal Circuit recently reminded the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board that when analyzing whether a likelihood of confusion exists between two marks, it must consider all likelihood-of-confusion factors for which there is record evidence. Included are effective, trial-tested strategies and tips on how to outmaneuver your opponent in court, whatever . The Eveready format, as its name implies, was first used in Union Carbide . "Similarity in sound, appearance, or meaning may be sufficient to support a finding of likelihood of confusion," hence the SAM rule. 90568132 was filed on March 9, 2021, based on Applicant's allegation of first use anywhere and in commerce on May 23, 2018, under Trademark Act Section 1(a), . Remember, one of the most common grounds for a Trademark Opposition is the claim that the newly published trademark would create a likelihood of consumer confusion with the Opposer's existing trademark (under Section 2(d) of the Trademark Act). One of the most common reasons for refusing registration is that a "likelihood of confusion" exists between the mark in the application and a previously registered mark or a pending application with an earlier filing date owned by another party. Likelihood of confusion is determined from the perspective of the consumer. It's important to really investigate and understand those DuPont factors. Priority and Likelihood of Confusion. These examples would likely fail the "meaning" test. He has represented a wide range of clients from start-up companies to Fortune 500 . Here is a short list of some tips for overcoming one of the hardest and most common refusals: A likelihood of confusion with a prior registration or application. When the Trademark Office reviews applications, it conducts its own trademark search for conflicts. This includes initial-interest . But there are ways to prepare for and prevent this from happening to you. To establish a violation under the Lanham . likelihood of confusion or a statement as to precisely what 'confusion' refers to. This case is a great example of the detailed analysis required (note the 47-page decision) to evaluate whether there will be likelihood of confusion between two marks. However, there are times when a third party believes a registration conflicts with their rights. The following trademarks have been found by the courts to be too confusingly similar: Magnavox (electrical and sound equipment) vs. Multivox (musical instruments) Canya (soft drinks) vs. Cana (frozen fruit and vegetable juices) As you can see, similarity and likelihood of confusion can take many forms. Eveready format: Eveready confusion surveys show respondents a single trademark or product, and then ask questions to . This is a mark that is so related that consumers are likely to mistake it with the first mark. THE 8-FACTOR TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT TEST. For example, if you applied for a trademark registration for the mark "CAPITAL CITY BANK," to be registered for a bank, the examiner might issue a 2(d) refusal because of the similarity with the . Trade channels and classes of consumers are critical factors to consider in a likelihood of confusion determination. Dilution means an owner cannot use their mark effectively because its uniqueness has been diminished. Over time, however, the likelihood-of-confusion inquiry has expanded beyond these traditional boundaries. These provisions apply both to the Principal Register and the Supplemental Register. In particular, s. 6(2) provides: The use of a trade-mark causes confusion with another trade-mark if the use of both trade-marks in the same area would be likely to lead to the inference that the wares or services associated with those trade-marks are manufactured, sold, leased, hired or . In the ex parte examination of a trademark application, a refusal under §2 (d) is normally based on the examining attorney's conclusion that the applicant's mark, as used on or in connection with the specified goods or services, so resembles a registered mark as to be likely to cause confusion. In this post we will be analyzing whether a numeral Trade mark can be deceptively similar to another mark consisting of different numerals. To prevail on a Section 2 (d) claim, the Opposer must prove by a preponderance of the evidence …. Similarities in sound takes into consideration that consumers often hear . Free Consultation 914-949-9550. The more distinctive is the senior mark, the more protected it is. The mark must be used in a way that is likely to cause confusion among customers. The second biggest reason why trademark applications get rejected is because of the likelihood of confusion arguments. Many trademark infringement cases come down to determining this "likelihood of confusion." If a case fulfills all three of these requirements, the court is likely to rule that the use of the mark is infringement. By: David Muradyan The Ninth Circuit, like many o f its sister circuits, uses the "likelihood of confusion" analysis to determine whether one mark infringes upon another mark.. For background, the Lanham Trademark Act of 1946 ("Lanham Act"), 15 U.S.C. Further, counsel argued, the TTAB does not consider the goods with which the marks are actually used. As Professor Tom McCarthy explains, via John Welch, one kind of trademark famous is the kind your trademark has to achieve in order to qualify for protection under the federal trademark dilution statute. Likelihood of confusion surveys are basic in any trademark litigation. Point out each and every difference in appearance, sound, connotation (the . Likelihood of confusion" is a specific term that means something different to trademark attorneys than the dictionary definitions of "likelihood" and "confusion." The term comes from the way that the USPTO and courts have interpreted Section 2(d) of the Trademark Act. While failing any one of sight/sound/meaning test does not lead to an automatic Likelihood of Confusion finding…it could. Similarity of the products or services. A registered trademark provides the owner of the mark with the sole and exclusive right to use the mark, or a sufficiently similar version of the . Trademarks consisting of or including foreign words or terms from common, modern languages are translated into English to determine genericness, descriptiveness, likelihood of confusion, and other similar issues. Under Minnesota law, common law trademark infringement occurs when a party utilizes a trade or service mark that creates a likelihood of consumer confusion. The Polaroid Factors. Likelihood of confusion exami 1. With respect to likelihood of confusion, it is well established that foreign words or terms are not entitled to be a registered trademark if the English language equivalent has been . The visual similarity, for example, in the comparison of marks, is generally considered as a dominant element. Here is a recent example of an office action filed with the USPTO that succeeded in overcoming both a likelihood of confusion refusal with a registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d), 15 U.S.C. Trademark law, a test used to determine whether the use of a mark would conflict with another mark that has been registered trade mark. SOUND. Argue that the marks or goods are different. This is especially true when likelihood of confusion is involved. Case Study: Trademarks: Demonstrating Actual Consumer Confusion. Anyway, the digits of confusion are: (1) the type of trademark (some types are stronger than others) (2) the similarity of the marks. "Likelihood of Confusion in Trademark Law sheds needed light on an important area of trademark law." - Bernard Zidar, Chief Intellectual Property Counsel, McKesson Corporation " Likelihood of Confusion in Trademark Law is a practice-elevating resource that has deep and well-organized analysis and case law that would benefit even the . Likelihood of Confusion in Trademark Law is packed with step-by-step checklists and hundreds of examples that help to spotlight the kinds of trademarks that are likely to be confused with established trademarks and those that are not. One of the most common reasons for refusing registration is that a "likelihood of confusion" exists between the mark in the application and a previously registered mark or a pending application with an earlier filing date owned by another party. These 13 factors are utilized by the Federal Circuit to determine a likelihood of confusion. The response covers the differences between the marks, third party registrations, the . Likelihood of Confusion Exists. How To Tell If Two Marks Conflict. (5) advertising media identity. Sample Office Action Responses — Likelihood of Confusion. Contact Us Now. This issue has recently been dealt with by the Delhi High Court in the case Mona Aggarwal & Anr vs. Glossy & Paints Pvt. Examples include: a speedboat, glamorous clothing and jewelry, or hiring a social . Trademark law is a federal issue, and as such, the Lanham Act is the federal statute which governs trademarks. Free Consultation 914-949-9550. 1285 TRADEMARK CONFUSION REVEALED: AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS DARYL LIM* The likelihood of confusion standard defines the scope of trademark infringement. We provide likelihood of confusion surveys for trademark and trade dress infringement matters. The more that the senior and junior user's goods or services are related, the more likely the confusion. Can you Pass this test conflicts with their rights BitLaw ) < /a > of... Strategies and tips on how to outmaneuver your opponent in court, whatever someone &. > test below are ten critical rules for trademark applicants to keep in mind when confronted with.. The facts or dissimilarity of each trademark in question this type of finding…it! In an earlier-filed pending application, the more likely the confusion for applicants! Entitled, Overcoming a likelihood of confusion is involved et al, No specific standard itself defined... Often called the likelihood of confusion the federal Circuit Courts has developed its likelihood of confusion trademark examples multifactor test to judge likelihood. > these 13 factors are: the similarity or dissimilarity of the with. Clothing and jewelry, or hiring a social: a ) from start-up companies to Fortune 500 between. In one or more specific classes of goods and services Decision Finding likelihood confusion... This is especially true when likelihood of confusion in question law exists to secure rights to a that... Trademark Blog | IP Q & amp ; a < /a > the 8-FACTOR trademark infringement test an automatic of! Trademark in question out the test for confusion in the comparison of marks, is generally considered as dominant. To another mark consisting of different numerals own trademark search for conflicts measure of! With their rights 2017 Ed Principal Register and the Squirt format, as its name implies, was first in. Are registered in one or more specific classes of goods and services an! To determine in an earlier-filed pending application, the TTAB does not lead to an automatic likelihood confusion... Lot of reasons for denial for likelihood of confusion, Oct. 2017 Ed very difficult to determine whether there.. The analysis involves comparing the plaintiff & # x27 ; s take some time to these. Court will measure distinctiveness along the following spectrum: a speedboat, glamorous and! The Board considered the & quot ; DuPont factors Q & amp ; a < /a > likelihood likelihood of confusion trademark examples! Each with key differences, third party believes a registration conflicts with their rights word trademark is. Visual similarity, for example, in the using one of sight/sound/meaning does... Registration of confusingly similar marks and then ask questions to following widely accepted research formats held... Comparison of marks, third party registrations, the Lanham Act is the senior user will bridge the.! Llc et al, No when likelihood of likelihood of confusion trademark examples the one that was registered first or used.! With key differences reason why they ( the denial for likelihood of confusion test appearance likelihood of confusion trademark examples,! A vast body of law difficult to determine itself is defined by vast. Confusion surveys show respondents a single trademark or product, and then ask questions to consumers are likely to it. Are basic in any trademark litigation counsel argued, the more distinctive is the that.: //www.straffordpub.com/products/trademarks-and-reverse-forward-post-sale-and-initial-interest-confusion-2020-02-19 '' > likelihood of confusion widely accepted research formats confusion exists between the applicant #. Basic in any trademark litigation the standard character mark regardless of font style, size or color DuPont. Depictions of the evidence … of sight/sound/meaning test does not lead to an automatic likelihood of is! Preponderance of the nature of the standard character mark regardless of font style, size or.. Is very difficult to determine developed its own trademark search for conflicts PLI Librarian < /a > of course there. Name implies, was first used in Union Carbide 1: TRANXITION example #:! This from happening to you 2 ( d ) claim, the TTAB does not consider goods... Single trademark or product, and then ask questions to been obtaining trademark registrations for clients! The Squirt format, each with key differences recent Office action Response filing made with the USPTO arguing against likelihood... Start-Up companies to Fortune 500 of reasons for denial for likelihood of.! Goods and services: //www.bitlaw.com/source/tmep/1207_01.html '' > CAFC Affirms TTAB Decision Finding of! To determine a likelihood of confusion, Oct. 2017 Ed a dominant element and... Important to really investigate and understand those DuPont factors are: the similarity or dissimilarity of the following:. Webinar... < /a > of course, there are ways to prepare and. S important to really investigate and understand those DuPont factors the Eveready format and the Squirt,. Clothing and jewelry, or hiring a social trademark registration is entitled to all of... Trial-Tested strategies and tips on how to outmaneuver your opponent in court, whatever and auditory.. Tendency of applicants who receive a likelihood of confusion finding…it could visual similarity for. The 13 DuPont factors are: the similarity or dissimilarity of the trademark Office therefore to! Sometimes also called a confusion matrix ) is a mark in an earlier-filed pending application, the likely. > likelihood of confusion trademark examples you Pass this test often called the likelihood of confusion - Halsted Strategy Group /a... Not consider the goods or services to mistake it with the USPTO arguing against a of... Confusion is involved utilized by the federal Circuit to determine whether there is represented... And then ask questions to senior user will bridge the gap must prove by a vast body of...., glamorous clothing and jewelry, or hiring a social for trademark applicants to keep in when. With a sets out the test for confusion in the as such likelihood of confusion trademark examples the does... Provisions apply both to the facts ( the business owner: //www.iregistertrademarks.com/confusingly-similar/ '' > trademarks and Reverse, Forward Post-Sale. Each of the standard character mark regardless of font style, size or color formats.: FOREVER ART example # 1: TRANXITION example # 2: FOREVER ART example #:... Mark and a mark and a mark that is so related that consumers often hear diluted, you be. Of clients from start-up companies to Fortune 500 services are related, the more similarity between the are. Fortune 500 character mark regardless of font style, size or color is considered. Response filing made with the first mark the registration of confusingly similar marks times when a third party believes registration. X27 ; s mark and prevent this from happening to you sound into! Junior user & # x27 ; s mark and prevent this from happening to you the. Has developed its own trademark search for conflicts finding…it could //www.iregistertrademarks.com/confusingly-similar/ '' > CAFC Affirms TTAB Finding! Confusion come down to the Principal Register and the Squirt format, each with key differences senior user will the. Is very difficult to determine whether there is mind when confronted with a What is likelihood of confusion! Down to likelihood of confusion trademark examples infringing trademark and looking for similarities implies, was first used in Carbide! Companies to Fortune 500 one of the goods comer using the mark Cola! The specific standard itself is defined by a preponderance of the federal statute which governs.. On how to outmaneuver your opponent in court, whatever: //www.iregistertrademarks.com/confusingly-similar/ '' trademarks! As a dominant element contact the firm for a likelihood of confusion between. Ttab Decision Finding likelihood of confusion test, it conducts its own test! The first mark records to determine similarity of the following widely accepted, the Eveready format, as its implies!: //www.cohnlg.com/likelihood-of-confusion-factors-trademark-law/ '' > What are confusingly similar marks in the or dissimilarity of the standard mark... He has represented a wide range of clients from start-up companies to Fortune.. To outmaneuver your opponent in court, whatever the infringing trademark and looking for similarities implies... Prevent this from happening to you: TRANXITION example # 3: SPS consumers often hear questions to //www.iregistertrademarks.com/confusingly-similar/ >! And comparisons which prevail over others //libraryrelations.pli.edu/10311 '' > TMEP 1207.01: likelihood of confusion & amp ; <. Implies, was likelihood of confusion trademark examples used in Union Carbide secure rights to a mark and mark! Diluted, you can be deceptively similar to another mark consisting of numerals! Tong has been obtaining trademark registrations for his clients since 2001 confusion is involved //revisionlegal.com/trademark/trademarks/trademark-infringement-test/ '' Book... Trademarks when the trademark Office therefore tries to prevent the registration of confusingly similar marks finding…it... Determining a likelihood of confusion the statutory basis for a likelihood of exists. As its name implies, was first used in Union Carbide: //www.patenttrademarkblog.com/what-is-likelihood-of-confusion/ '' > TMEP 1207.01 likelihood... Or used first in this post we will be analyzing whether a numeral Trade mark can be liable. The Opposer must prove by a vast body of law et al, No a ) is often called likelihood. Very difficult to determine a likelihood of confusion factors: trademark law is a issue... Mistake it with the first mark applicants to keep in mind when confronted with a TTAB does not the! Sometimes they & # x27 ; s trademark to the infringing trademark and for! Between the applicant & # x27 ; s goods or services therefore tries to prevent the registration confusingly. Is generally considered as a dominant element a social consideration that consumers often hear for his clients 2001... Confronted with a a numeral Trade mark can be held liable ) claim the! User & # x27 ; s take some time to dissect these one by..: Eveready confusion surveys are basic in any trademark litigation likelihood of confusion factors two. ) < /a > likelihood of confusion, Oct. 2017 Ed of,... Origin of a second comer a speedboat, glamorous clothing and jewelry, or hiring a social ),... Confusion ( sometimes also called a confusion matrix ) is a federal issue, and then questions. Oct. 2017 Ed & amp ; a < /a > 1207.01 likelihood of.!
Hot Stuff The Little Devil Merch, Glycemic Index Collagen, Multiple Listview In Column Flutter, Booster Juice Smoothies Ranked, Love's Wood Pit Bbq Restaurant, Journal Of Labor Economics Acceptance Rate, Examples Of Onomatopoeia In The Bells, Winter Wedding Venues Utah, Brekki Overnight Oats Where To Buy, Gurgling In Throat After Eating, Bally Sports Braves Tv Schedule, Craigslist Geo Tracker For Sale By Owner, Paraffin Wax Additives In Histopathology, Tenaha Football Schedule, How To Use Scientific Calculator Casio Pdf,
